Identity and markers of adulthood: The relationship between two constructs

0Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The article presents both the classical and contemporary approaches to the analysis of identity formation. Special emphasis has been placed on the processual approach, in which identity is regarded as a dynamic construct that remains in constant, mutual relations with personal and contextual factors. Since research on identity has been predominantly based on studies conducted on individuals in adolescence and early adulthood, i.e. in the time of transition to adulthood, the article focuses on adulthood markers that may be found in this particular phase of human development. The authors have distinguished different markers of adulthood (transitions to adult roles, psychosocial maturity, sense of adulthood) and have described their links to identity. In the conclusion of the present paper, it has been stressed that future research on identity should to a large extent include factors originating from these different categories of conditions, and that researchers ought to consider the interactions of these factors as predictors of identity formation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brzezinska, A. I., & Piotrowski, K. (2013). Identity and markers of adulthood: The relationship between two constructs. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 44(3), 254–265. https://doi.org/10.2478/ppb-2013-0029

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free