Abstract
There has been discussion lately about whether bootstrap versus permutations methods are the more appropriate in diagnostic psychophysiology, especially in the context of concealed information tests (CITs), also called guilty knowledge tests (GKTs). We review the use of bootstrapping in most published CIT/GKT studies (where means, or correlations, as opposed to peak amplitudes are estimated) and find them valid and reliable. When bootstrapping and permutations were applied to the same synthesized ERP datasets, they agreed 98.1% of the time, averaged over 24,000 iterations.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rosenfeld, J. P., & Donchin, E. (2015). Resampling (bootstrapping) the mean: A definite do. Psychophysiology, 52(7), 969–972. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12421
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.