Becoming a Hybrid Entity: A Policy Option for Public Health

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When Congress passed HIPAA, it did not intend to constrain public health's data sharing in the same way as clinical or payers. In fact, HIPAA recognizes data sharing with public health as a matter of national priority and shields this function from its reach. However, a health department may offer services that bring it within HIPAA's purview, such as running a Children's Health Insurance Program or a laboratory that bills electronically. When this is the case, HIPAA requires all information and departments be subject to HIPAA unless the public health authority chooses to hybridize. Health departments might re-assess their coverage and elect to become a hybrid entity, thereby restricting HIPAA to only where required and removing barriers to information sharing with communities.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milam, S., & Moorehead, M. (2019). Becoming a Hybrid Entity: A Policy Option for Public Health. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(2_suppl), 68–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110519857321

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free