Evolution of genotypic resistance algorithms and their impact on the interpretation of clinical trials: An OPTIMA trial substudy

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: The outdated rules of older HIV genotypic resistance algorithms can affect virologic responses. This study was designed to determine how often these incorrect resistance interpretations affect analyses of long-term clinical trials, antiretroviral (ARV) choices, and HIV disease progression rates. Method: Baseline VIRCO virtual phenotypes (WP) from patients screened in 2001-2002 for OPTIMA were compared to 2005 Stanford HIV resistance database algorithm (HIVDB-10/05, version 4.1.4) interpretations of the HIV-1 pol sequences. Drugs were called discordant if resistant by one algorithm and sensitive by the other. Results: Of 2,341 drug comparisons, 501 (21.4%) were discordant, affecting 140 (86.4%) of 162 screened patients. NRTI/NtRTIs were more discordant than NNRTIs and PIs (38.6% vs. 4.3% vs. 12.8%; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Desai, S., Kyriakides, T., Holodniy, M., Al-Salman, J., Griffith, B., & Kozal, M. (2007). Evolution of genotypic resistance algorithms and their impact on the interpretation of clinical trials: An OPTIMA trial substudy. HIV Clinical Trials, 8(5), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1310/hct0805-293

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free