How many 16S-based studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? It may be a matter of etymology

27Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The word 'metagenomic' is one of the most used words in environmental microbiology especially in recent years, yet sometimes it is a little overused. Can studies targeting a single gene be considered 'metagenomic'? It is more controversial than once thought, maybe a possible solution may come from an etymological analysis of the word. © 2014 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. All rights reserved.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Esposito, A., & Kirschberg, M. (2014). How many 16S-based studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? It may be a matter of etymology. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 351(2), 145–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1574-6968.12375

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free