Energy Service Security for Public Health Resilience: Perception and Concerns in Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan☆

3Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan includes six rural counties and one Tribal Nation. The region is characterized by long winters, legacies of the extractive mining economy, and the infrastructural features of extreme rurality, including aging housing and low health service density. The region also faces exceptionally high electricity prices. There is limited research on the public health implications of energy service disruption in rural regions resulting from the increasing intensity and frequency of weather events caused by climate change. This article presents research findings examining the readiness of health facilities in this area to manage the rising intensity, severity, and frequency of severe weather that could disrupt energy services. The study also considers how this knowledge can guide decision-making to improve energy service access and maintain resilient public health services in the region. This exploratory study utilized a qualitative approach that combines semi-structured interviews with public health stakeholders and a short survey to triangulate the findings from health facilities. Given the pivotal role of dependable energy services in community health, these findings underscore the community's perception of self-reliance as both an asset and a hurdle. This perception aligns with the realities of rural communities at the “end of the line” regarding critical infrastructure, which also serves as a formidable barrier to social organization and infrastructure access during energy service disruptions that can severely impact public health.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tiwari, S., Ketola, Z., Schelly, C., & Boyer-Cole, E. (2024). Energy Service Security for Public Health Resilience: Perception and Concerns in Western Upper Peninsula of Michigan☆. Rural Sociology, 89(4), 932–953. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12571

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free