Walking the Talk: How to Identify Anti-Pluralist Parties

30Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The recent increase of democratic declines around the world – “the third wave of autocratization” – has sparked a new generation of studies on the topic. Scholars tend to agree that the main threat to contemporary democracy arises from democratically elected rulers who gradually erode democratic norms. Is it possible to identify future autocratizers before they win power in elections? Linz (1978) and Levitsky and Ziblatt (2018) suggest that a lacking commitment to democratic norms reveals would-be autocratizers before they reach office. This article argues that the concept of anti-pluralism rather than populism or extreme ideology captures this. We use a new expert-coded data set on virtually all relevant political parties worldwide from 1970 to 2019 (V-Party) to create a new Anti-Pluralism Index (API) to provide the first systematic empirical test of this argument. We find substantial evidence validating that the API and Linz’s litmus-test indicators signal leaders and parties that will derail democracy if and when they come into power.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Medzihorsky, J., & Lindberg, S. I. (2024). Walking the Talk: How to Identify Anti-Pluralist Parties. Party Politics, 30(3), 420–434. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688231153092

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free