Comparison of patterns of psychopathology in aesthetic rhinoplasty patients versus functional rhinoplasty patients

28Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives. To determine whether candidates for aesthetic rhinoplasty show more severe symptoms of psychopathology in comparison with functional rhinoplasty patients. Study Design. Case-control study. Aesthetic rhinoplasty candidates were taken as cases and functional rhinoplasty patients comprised the control group. Setting. A surgical center for rhinoplasty. Subjects and Methods. Forty-two patients seeking either aesthetic rhinoplasty (n = 21) or functional rhinoplasty (n = 21) were included in this study in winter 2012 using a convenience sampling method. All patients were asked to complete the Symptom Check List-90-Revised (SCL-90-R) preoperatively. An independent t test was performed for each subscale of the instrument. Cohens d was calculated as a measure of effect size. Pearsons correlation was also performed between the subscales. Results. Independent t test verified that aesthetic rhinoplasty patients scored significantly higher in 8 subscales of the SCL-90-R in comparison with functional rhinoplasty patients as control group. Aesthetic rhinoplasty seekers showed more severe symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorder (P < .01), depression (P < .01), interpersonal problems (P < .05), hostility (P < .01). All subscales were correlated strongly in the current sample. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that a sample of patients seeking aesthetic rhinoplasty had higher symptoms in various components of psychopathology compared with a control group. Therefore, preoperative psychological screening of aesthetic rhinoplasty candidates may be useful.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naraghi, M., & Atari, M. (2015). Comparison of patterns of psychopathology in aesthetic rhinoplasty patients versus functional rhinoplasty patients. Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), 152(2), 244–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599814560139

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free