Gezi Resistance in the Absence of Participation

  • Kurtarir E
  • Okten A
  • Cekic T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Construction sector was an engine of last ten year's economic development and this sector has nurtured by rapid urban regen-eration processes. In this period, Turkeys last quarter's popular concepts; localization, governance and participation had put on the shelf totally. Therefore, in the last 5 years, urban policy and planning became the most important issues of the central gov-ernment. Construction facilities put on the agenda directly by central government. Naturally, as Turkey's biggest metropolitan area İstanbul has been the focus of construction agenda. Proj-ects and plans leading spatial development also leads and gives direction to fundamental rights and life styles. Decision-making processes of such urban plans and projects also reflect the way of using participation rights. Experiences from İstanbul, particu-larly Gezi resistance, give an opportunity for critical evaluation of the participation problematic in our planning process. Civil resistance and disobedience that has been arising from and ur-ban movement has revealed that how the space has been po-liticized day by day. Urban planning has gone out of controlling mechanism of the planning system and became an intervention tool of the authority for daily life. As an abandoned concept, " participation in planning " constitutes the main theme of this article. ÖZET

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kurtarir, E., Okten, A., & Cekic, T. I. (2013). Gezi Resistance in the Absence of Participation. Journal of Planning, 23(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.5505/planlama.2013.58077

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free