Linguistic Relativity Revisited: The Interaction between L1 and L2 in Thinking, Learning, and Production

  • Pae H
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The linguistic relativity hypothesis (LRH; a.k.a., Whorfian hypothesis) is reconsidered with respect to second language (L2) acquisition. With ebbs and flows over time, the notion of LRH went through dis- missal and resurgence in linguistics, psychology, and anthropology. Empirical evidence gleaned from the pseudo-linguistic domains, such as color categorization, time perception, spatial cognition, and number recognition, supports the weak form of LRH. This article briefly reviews the conflicting views, discusses empirical evidence, and expands the premise of LRH to L2 learning. Of interest is the interface of syntax and semantics in English language learners’ (ELLs) ergative verb usage in which ELLs tend to overpas- sivize English ergative verbs (e.g., appear, happen, break). The source of prevalent overpassivization er- rors is discussed using the LRH framework.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pae, H. K. (2012). Linguistic Relativity Revisited: The Interaction between L1 and L2 in Thinking, Learning, and Production. Psychology, 03(01), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2012.31008

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free