Strict versus liberal insulin therapy in the cardiac surgery patient: An evidence-based practice development, implementation and evaluation project

1Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background Hyperglycemia post-cardiac surgery is associated with poor clinical outcomes. Recent studies suggest maintaining liberal glycemic control (< 180 mg/dL) using a continuous insulin infusion (CII) versus strict control achieves optimal outcomes and prevents hypoglycemia. Purpose To develop, implement and evaluate a nurse managed liberal CII protocol. Methods Retrospective review of 144 strict CII patient records and 147 liberal CII patient records. Results Mean blood glucose was 159.8 mg/dL (liberal CII) compared to 143.3 mg/dL (strict CII) (p ≤ 0.001). No surgical site infections occurred in either group. Mean ICU length of stay was 4.5 days (liberal) versus 4.4 days (strict) (p = 0.74). Two 30-day mortalities occurred for the liberal cohort compared to no deaths in the strict group (p = 0.49). Hypoglycemia incidence within 24 h after surgery was 0.1% (liberal) compared to 0.3% (strict) compared to (p = 0.16). Conclusion Use of a nurse managed liberal CII resulted in similar outcomes with fewer incidents of hypoglycemia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gordon, J. M., Lauver, L. S., & Buck, H. G. (2018). Strict versus liberal insulin therapy in the cardiac surgery patient: An evidence-based practice development, implementation and evaluation project. Applied Nursing Research, 39, 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2017.11.013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free