COMPARISON OF ARIMA AND GARMA'S PERFORMANCE ON DATA ON POSITIVE COVID-19 CASES IN INDONESIA

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The development of methods in statistics, one of which is used for prediction, is overgrowing. So it requires further analysis related to the goodness of the method. One of the comparisons made to the goodness of this model can be seen by applying it to actual cases around us. The real case still being faced by people worldwide, including in Indonesia, is Covid-19. Therefore, research comparing the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and the Gegenbauer autoregressive moving average (GARMA) method in positive confirmed cases of Covid-19 in Indonesia is essential. Based on the results of this research analysis, it was found that the best model with the Aikake's Information Criterion measure of goodness that was used to predict positive confirmed cases of Covid-19 in Indonesia was the Gegenbauer autoregressive moving average (GARMA) model.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sofro, A., & Khikmah, K. N. (2022). COMPARISON OF ARIMA AND GARMA’S PERFORMANCE ON DATA ON POSITIVE COVID-19 CASES IN INDONESIA. Barekeng, 16(3), 919–926. https://doi.org/10.30598/barekengvol16iss3pp919-926

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free