Percutaneous Zadek Osteotomy vs Open Haglund Resection for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: Early Outcomes and Complication Rates

6Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Insertional Achilles tendinopathy (IAT) is difficult to manage despite multiple surgical options. Two of the surgical options include an open midline Achilles tendon–splitting Haglund resection and a percutaneous Zadek osteotomy (ZO). The current study compared the patient-reported outcomes and complications of open vs percutaneous procedures in patients with IAT ± Haglund deformity. Methods: A retrospective comparative study of consecutive patients who underwent either an open midline Achilles tendon–splitting Haglund resection or percutaneous ZO for IAT ± Haglund deformity at a single institution with minimum 12 months’ follow-up was performed. Preoperative and postoperative Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores and complications were recorded for each patient and compared between cohorts. Results: Forty-three patients were treated with an open midline Achilles tendon–splitting Haglund resection and 34 patients were treated with a percutaneous ZO for IAT ± Haglund deformity. PROMIS function (P < .001), pain (P < .001), and mobility (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kiriluk, S. H., Vulcano, E., Schipper, O. N., Kaplan, J. R. M., Johnson, A. H., Ventresca, H., … Gonzalez, T. A. (2025). Percutaneous Zadek Osteotomy vs Open Haglund Resection for Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: Early Outcomes and Complication Rates. Foot and Ankle International, 46(10), 1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1177/10711007251359639

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free