Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the cost benefit and transfusions of oral and IV tranexamic acid (TXA) in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oral and IV TXA in primary THA. Primary outcomes were total blood loss, maximum hemoglobin drop, transfusion requirements, and cost benefit. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and/or pulmonary embolism (PE). Results: Four independent RCTs were included involving 391 patients. There was no difference in the total blood loss (P = .99), maximum hemoglobin drop (P = .73), and the length of stay (P = .95) between the 2 groups. Transfusion requirements (P = .97) were similar. The total mean cost was the US $75.41 in oral TXA group and the US $580.83 in IV TXA group. The incidence of DVT (P = .3) did not differ significantly between the 2 groups, and no PE was reported in all studies. Conclusion: Oral TXA shows similar efficacy and safety as IV TXA in reducing total blood loss, maximum hemoglobin drop and transfusion requirements in primary THA. However, oral TXA may be more cost-benefit than IV TXA. Level of Evidence: Level I, therapeutic study. Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval, DVT = deep vein thrombosis, IV = intravenous, MD = mean difference, PE = pulmonary embolisms RCTs = randomized controlled trials TKA = total knee arthro last TXA = tranexamic acid
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wang, N., Xiong, X., Xu, L., Ji, M., Yang, T., Tang, J., … Chen, H. (2019, April 1). Transfusions and cost-benefit of oral versus intravenous tranexamic acid in primary total hip arthroplasty A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (United States). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000015279
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.