Evaluation of a bedside test for phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in preterm labour

29Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of a bedside test kit for phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) in the diagnosis of preterm labour and the prediction of subsequent preterm delivery. Materials and Methods: We performed a bedside test for IGFBP-1 in 47 women who presented to the delivery suite in suspected preterm labour between 23 and 33 weeks. Tocolysis and steroid therapy were administered in all cases. Results: Twenty-nine women (61.7%) tested negative and 18 women tested positive (38.3%). There was no statistical significance between the 2 groups except that the test-positive group had a greater median cervical dilatation (2.0 cm) compared to the test-negative group (1.0 cm) (P <0.05). The women who tested positive had a statistically significant longer median duration of hospitalisation, stay in delivery suite and tocolytic therapy (5.0 days, 56.0 hours and 34.5 hours respectively) compared to women who were test-negative (3.0 days, 19.0 hours and 10.0 hours respectively) (P <0.05). In addition, 91.7% of the patients in the IGFBP-1 negative group had a delay of more than 7 days between the onset of contractions and delivery, while only 44.4% of the women in the pIGFBP-1 positive group experienced such a delay. Conclusion: These results suggest that there may be a role for cervical IGFBP-1 test in the management of women presenting with suspected preterm labour. It may allow us to focus our efforts on women who are more likely to have a preterm delivery and perhaps allow us to avoid unnecessary treatment and to contain healthcare costs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kwek, K., Khi, C., Ting, H. S., & Yeo, G. S. H. (2004). Evaluation of a bedside test for phosphorylated insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in preterm labour. Annals of the Academy of Medicine Singapore, 33(6), 780–783. https://doi.org/10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.kwek

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free