Why Training and Development Programs Don't Improve Employee Productivity

  • Azeem F
  • Atta S
  • Rasheed K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study investigates why training and development initiatives don't boost production. This research will determine what characteristics caused employees to do the same after receiving training from the company. Today, research is crucial to proving an area's legitimacy. Training and development are crucial in any organization and can lead to excellent results, but not all organizations do so, therefore we must consider the other side. Many firms devote cash for the T&D department to determine how effective these programs are and how they affect employee productivity. We used the Kirkpatrick Four-Level Training Evaluation Model to objectively assess training efficacy. Our preference was the Kirkpatrick Model due to its benefits. Works using traditional and digital learning programs had explicit evaluation steps. It helped us understand how training programs affect company outcomes. We found it easy to adopt the approach due to its flexibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Azeem, F., Atta, S. H., Rasheed, K., Rafique, M. S., & Muhammad, F. (2024). Why Training and Development Programs Don’t Improve Employee Productivity. European Journal of Applied Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(3), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejaset.2024.2(3).12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free