Doctors in leadership roles: consequences for quality and safety

12Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPACT: In the English NHS and other healthcare systems (such as Belgium, Germany and Italy), there has been growing enthusiasm for increasing the involvement of clinical professionals in senior leadership and management roles. This article examines the performance benefits of this involvement for quality and safety outcomes—specifically patient experience and hospital infection rates. The findings have important implications for key stakeholders. For professional bodies, the results could help to assuage concerns about management and persuade more doctors to invest in leadership training and education. For managers, the findings suggest increasing support for clinical leadership roles and focusing more on succession and career planning at the organizational level. Lastly, for policy-makers, the results further reinforce the need to boost clinical leadership in healthcare services—both rhetorically and in terms of the allocation of resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kirkpatrick, I., Altanlar, A., & Veronesi, G. (2024). Doctors in leadership roles: consequences for quality and safety. Public Money and Management, 44(6), 515–522. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2023.2217344

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free