The relative impact of urinary and sexual function vs bother on health utility for men with prostate cancer

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Function and bother are related but distinct aspects of health-related quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare quantitatively the relative impacts of function and bother in urinary, sexual, and bowel outcomes on health utility as a reflection of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Our analysis included participants in the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor utility supplementary study, with a final cohort of 1617 men. Linear regression on the patients' function and bother summary scores (0-100) from the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index was performed to predict bias-corrected health utilities. Urinary and sexual bother were associated with each health utility, and their coefficients were 3.7 and 20.8 times greater, respectively, than those of the corresponding function. To our knowledge, our study provides the first quantitative and direct comparison of the impacts of function vs bother on health utility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jeong, C. W., Herlemann, A., Cowan, J. E., Broering, J. M., Ten Ham, R. M. T., Wilson, L. S., … Cooperberg, M. R. (2021). The relative impact of urinary and sexual function vs bother on health utility for men with prostate cancer. JNCI Cancer Spectrum, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1093/JNCICS/PKAA044

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free