The traditional notion of case is too coarse to distinguish between the English prepositional dative and the English shifted dative, the Spanish bare accusative and the Spanish “a” accusative, etc. I show that refining our typology of case to include such distinctions resolves a *ABA counterexample to Caha’s 2009 case hierarchy and I discuss where these new distinctions should be placed in the underlying representation of case.
CITATION STYLE
Starke, M. (2017). Resolving (DAT = ACC) ≠ GEN. Glossa, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5334/gjgl.408
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.