Prognostic value and adverse events of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in primary advanced and platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: The original meta-analysis of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is already outdated, owing to the latest trial results. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and adverse events of cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC compared to conventional therapy for advanced and platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (OC). Methods: In this meta-analysis, phase II/III controlled trials regarding ‘HIPEC’ and ‘ovarian cancer’ were searched for in electronic databases from inception to March 2022. Results: Twenty-one studies were included in the quantitative synthesis. The pooled hazard ratio [HR] in the HIPEC group for progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45–0.83, p =.002) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.51–0.82, p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xia, Y., Wang, H., Zhang, J., & Wang, Y. (2023). Prognostic value and adverse events of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in primary advanced and platinum-sensitive recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Hyperthermia. Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2023.2165729

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free