The original version of this article unfortunately contains unmatched footnote references and footnote text. Reference 9: should point to the text in footnote 35 Reference 10: should point to the text in footnote 9 Reference 11: should point to the text in footnote 10 Reference 12: should point to the text in footnote 11 Reference 13: should point to the text in footnote 12 Reference 14: should point to the text in footnote 13 Reference 15: should point to the text in footnote 14 Reference 16: should point to the text in footnote 15 Reference 17: should point to the text in footnote 16 Reference 18: should point to the text in footnote 17 Reference 20: should point to the text in footnote 18 Reference 21: should point to the text in footnote 36 Reference 22: should point to the text in footnote 20 Reference 23: should point to the text in footnote 21 Reference 25: should point to the text in footnote 22 Reference 26: should point to the text in footnote 23 Reference 27: should point to the text in footnote 37 Reference 28: should point to the text in footnote 25 Reference 29: should point to the text in footnote 26 Reference 30: should point to the text in footnote 27 Reference 31: should point to the text in footnote 28 Reference 32: should point to the text in footnote 29 Reference 33: should point to the text in footnote 30 Reference 34: should point to the text in footnote 31 Reference 35: should point to the text in footnote 32 Reference 36: should point to the text in footnote 33 Reference 37: should point to the text in footnote 34 The original article has been corrected.
CITATION STYLE
Lodi, M., & Martini, S. (2022, April 1). Correction to: Computational Thinking, Between Papert and Wing (Science & Education, (2021), 30, 4, (883-908), 10.1007/s11191-021-00202-5). Science and Education. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00268-1
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.