Abstract
The importance of providing explanations for predictions made by black-box models has led to the development of explainer model methods such as LIME (local interpretable model-agnostic explanations). LIME uses a surrogate model to explain the relationship between predictor variables and predictions from a black-box model in a local region around a prediction of interest. However, the quality of the resulting explanations relies on how well the explainer model captures the black-box model in a specified local region. Here we introduce three visual diagnostics to assess the quality of LIME explanations: (1) explanation scatterplots, (2) assessment metric plots, and (3) feature heatmaps. We apply the visual diagnostics to a forensics bullet matching dataset to show examples where LIME explanations depend on the tuning parameter values and the explainer model oversimplifies the black-box model. Our examples raise concerns about claims made of LIME that are similar to other criticisms in the literature.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Goode, K., & Hofmann, H. (2021). Visual diagnostics of an explainer model: Tools for the assessment of LIME explanations. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining, 14(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/sam.11500
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.