Risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal adverse events (FAEs) with sorafenib use in patients with solid cancers: a meta-analysis of phase 3 RCTs

  • Gyawali B
  • Shimokata T
  • Honda K
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Sorafenib is a commonly used vascular endothelial growth factor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in a variety of cancers. There are concerns about the increased risk of SAEs and FAEs with sorafenib. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis of all phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of sorafenib to quantify the increased risk of SAEs and FAEs. Methods: We carried out a systematic search on PubMed for studies published in English. Eligibility criteria included phase 3 RCTs of solid tumors comparing sorafenib, alone or in combination with non-targeted chemotherapy (Sorafenib arm) versus placebo or non-targeted chemotherapy (control arm). Data on SAEs and FAEs for both the arms were extracted from each study and pooled to determine the overall incidence, relative risks (RRs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs). Results: Of 471 studies identified, a total of 12 phase 3 RCTs involving 6,797 solid cancer patients comparing sorafenib with control met the eligibility criteria and included in this meta-analysis. 8 RCTs compared sorafenib alone with a placebo and 4 RCTs compared sorafenib plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy plus placebo. The RCTs involved Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC, n = 5), Melanoma (n= 2), non-small cell lung cancer ( n = 2), pancreatic cancer, renal cell carcinoma and thyroid cancer ( n = 1 each). The overall incidence of SAEs and FAEs with sorafenib were 24.5% (95% CI: 16.0%-35.5%) and 1.6% (95% CI: 0.7%- 3.3%) respectively. Compared with control, sorafenib use significantly increased the risk of both SAEs ( RR : 1.51, 95% CI: 1.20-1.92, P < 0.001) and FAEs ( RR : 1.84, 95% CI: 1.29-2.64, P = 0.001). This association varied significantly with cancer types ( P = 0.001) and approval status ( P = 0.018) for SAEs but no evidence for heterogeneity was found for FAEs. The risk for SAEs was significantly higher for HCC (RR: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.18-4.10, P = 0.013) and non-approved use of sorafenib (RR: 1.68, 95% CI: 1.24-2.29, P = 0.001). Conclusions: This meta-analysis of phase 3 RCTs demonstrates an increased risk of SAEs and FAEs with sorafenib use in patients with solid cancers. Special vigilance is recommended while using sorafenib in non-approved settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gyawali, B., Shimokata, T., Honda, K., & Ando, Y. (2016). Risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and fatal adverse events (FAEs) with sorafenib use in patients with solid cancers: a meta-analysis of phase 3 RCTs. Annals of Oncology, 27, vi498. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw390.04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free