The consultant's role in continuing medical education of general practitioners: The case of rheumatology

17Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Consultant rheumatologists were surveyed by questionnaire about their contribution to the continuing education of general practitioners, and 84% (203/243) replied. Altogether 157 respondents had participated in some form of teaching, 147 in collective teaching sessions such as lectures and 99 in the teaching of small groups. Arthritis comprised 44% of the rheumatological topics taught; there was a noticeable lack of teaching on problems commonly encountered in general practice, such as soft tissue rheumatism and injury and back pain, and on clinical skills including examination and injection of joints. Eighty eight respondents made comments and suggestions. The favoured educational strategies were small group teaching, apprenticeship schemes, and interchange between general practitioners and consultants about shared cases. This contrasts with what was typically done—namely, formal lectures on rheumatoid arthritis in postgraduate medical centres. These findings raise questions about the continuing education of consultants themselves as well as about the consultants' role in teaching others. © 1987, British Medical Journal Publishing Group. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Badley, E. M., & Lee, J. (1987). The consultant’s role in continuing medical education of general practitioners: The case of rheumatology. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.), 294(6564), 100–103. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.294.6564.100

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free