Orrin hatch and the dietary supplement health and education act: Pandora's box revisited

9Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Products of unknown safety and efficacy were once referred to as "quackery," and the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was empowered to protect public health by preventing their sale and forcing them from the market. However, in 1994, the Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act legitimized their sale as "dietary supplements." Sales increased dramatically, and many Americans now use herbals, homeopathics, and other so-called supplements. The Food and Drug Administration cannot act against them until patients have already been harmed, a dangerous situation. Furthermore, no governmental agency has the authority to force the manufacturers to furnish proof of efficacy. It is vital for physicians to warn their patients that they should use these unproven products only with great caution, and must never discontinue legitimate medical therapy in lieu of unproven products. © 2012 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pray, W. S. (2012, May). Orrin hatch and the dietary supplement health and education act: Pandora’s box revisited. Journal of Child Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0883073812441064

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free