Intervalo de nacimiento entre gemelos como determinante del resultado neonatal precoz

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Most scientific societies recommend vaginal delivery of the second twin when the first twin is in cephalic presentation. In these cases, there is controversy over how much inter-twin interval is decisive in the adverse outcome of the second twin. The aim of this study is to examine whether inter-twin delivery interval affects immediate perinatal outcome and the cost of neonatal and maternal stays. Methods: Retrospective cohort study including 128 twin vaginal births attended in the Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de la Candelaria between May 2014 and December 2018. We compared the presence of composite adverse neonatal outcome by establishing interval cut-off points between birth of 10 and 30 minutes. Likewise, the relationship of other delivery associated variables with neonatal outcome was examined. Health care costs were calculated. Results: There was a higher rate of composite adverse neonatal outcome in the 10 minute-group (p = 0.026, OR 2.4) and three times higher in the 30 minute-group (p = 0.013, OR 6.4). A significant negative linear correlation was obtained between birth interval and umbilical artery pH. Prematurity and low birth weight were predictors of a poor neonatal outcome. Conclusion: Our data suggests that inter-twin delivery interval shouldn't be prolonged beyond 30 minutes. Vaginal delivery is a safe option in twin gestations providing the first twin is in a cephalic presentation, regardless of the second twin presentation.