Evaluation of internal and shell stiffness in the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions by shear wave elastography

18Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND The diagnostic specificity of conventional ultrasound for breast non-mass lesions (NMLs) is low at approximately 21%-43%. Shear wave elastography (SWE) can distinguish benign from malignant lesions by evaluating the internal and peripheral stiffness. SWE has good reproducibility and high diagnostic efficacy. However, there are very few independent studies on the diagnostic value of SWE in breast NMLs. AIM To determine the value of SWE in the differential diagnosis of breast NMLs. METHODS This study enrolled a total of 118 patients with breast NMLs who underwent SWE examinations in the Beijing Shijitan Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University and The Second Hospital of Shandong University from January 2019 to January 2020. The internal elastic parameters of the lesions were recorded, including maximum (Emax), mean (Emean) and minimum elastic values and the standard deviation. The following peripheral parameters were noted: Presence of a "stiff rim" sign; Emax, and Emean elasticity values within 1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2 mm, 2.5 mm and 3 mm from the edge of NMLs. The receiver operating characteristic curve of each parameter was drawn, and the areas under the curve were calculated. RESULTS Emax, Emean and elastic values, and the standard deviation of the internal elastic values in malignant NMLs were significantly higher than those in benign NMLs (P < 0.05). The percentage with the "stiff rim" sign in malignant NMLs was significantly higher than that in the benign group (P < 0.05), and Emax and Emean at the shell of 1 mm, 1.5 mm, 2 mm, 2.5 mm and 3 mm in the malignant group were all higher than those in the benign group (P < 0.05). Of the surrounding elasticity values, Emax of the shell at 2.5 mm in malignant NMLs had maximum areas under the curve of 0.900, and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity were 94.57% and 85.86%, respectively. CONCLUSION The "stiff rim" sign and multiple quantitative elastic values within and around the lesion had good diagnostic performance in the differential diagnosis of breast NMLs. Emax in peripheral tissue had better diagnostic efficiency than other parameters.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Xu, P., Wu, M., Yang, M., Xiao, J., Ruan, Z. M., & Wu, L. Y. (2020). Evaluation of internal and shell stiffness in the differential diagnosis of breast non-mass lesions by shear wave elastography. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 8(12), 2510–2519. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v8.i12.2510

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free