Significance of anterior Q waves in left anterior fascicular block - A clinical and noninvasive assessment

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Electrocardiographic (ECG) Q waves in V leads (V2 or V3) pose a diagnostic challenge in the presence of left anterior fascicular block (LAFB). Benign Q waves in the absence of coronary artery disease (CAD) primarily due to LAFB have been described. This study evaluates Q waves in the presence of LAFB. Hypothesis: Anterior Q waves in the presence of LAFB may not be indicative of myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: From 1990 to 1997, ECGs of 236 male patients with LAFB were analyzes for presence of Q waves in the V leads. Records were reviewed for evidence of CAD. Of 236 patients with LAFB, 61 (26%) had Q waves in the V leads. In this group, 31 patients were available for further analysis. Results: Of the 31 patients with Q waves in the V leads who were available for further study, LAFB was present in 22 patients (71%) and LAFB plus right bundle-branch block (RBBB) were present in 9 (29%). Of 20 patients with Q waves due to MI, 13 (65%) had LAFB and 7 (35%) had LAFB plus RBBB. Of 11 patients with benign Q waves, 9 (82%) and 2 (18%) had LAFB and LAFB plus RBBB, respectively. Benign Q waves were noted in 5.3% (11/206) patients with LAFB. The mean duration of Q waves and Q-wave location limited to V2 and/or V3 are 0.029 s and 64% versus 0.053 s and 15% in benign versus pathologic Q waves, respectively. Conclusion: Patients with LAFB in the absence of MI may have Q waves in the V leads that are approximately 0.02 s in duration and restricted to one or two leads. This anomaly may represent a variation of conduction in the initial 0.02 s QRS vector due to LAFB.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shettigar, U. R., Pannuri, A., Barbier, G. H., & Appunn, D. O. (2002). Significance of anterior Q waves in left anterior fascicular block - A clinical and noninvasive assessment. Clinical Cardiology, 25(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.4950250106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free