Safety of conservative approach for persistent patent ductus arteriosus in preterm infants: Neurodevelopmental outcomes at 5 years of age

Abstract

Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is a common problem among preterm infants. The standard of care for PDA has been to attempt to close the PDA by pharmacological treatment or surgical ligation. Recently, conservative approach for PDA (i.e., infants receive no treatment for PDA unless it is necessary for rescue) is gaining interest. However, when PDA is persisted under the conservative approach, there is a concern about the neurodevelopmental problems caused by decreased cerebral oxygenation. Our objective was to examine the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm infants, when PDA remained persistently open under conservative approach for PDA. We retrospectively analyzed data from the medical charts in 72 included infants (gestational age < 29 weeks, birth weight < 1,250 g). Under our conservative approach for PDA, we divided infants by their ductal patency: a closed ductus group (ductus closure within 14 days after birth, n = 52) and a persistent patent ductus arteriosus group (ductus closure after 14 days, n = 20). We compared the clinical parameters and neurodevelopmental outcomes assessed with the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC) at 5 years of corrected age in two groups. Among the children who completed the K-ABC test, there were no significant differences in neurodevelopmental scores between a closed ductus group (n = 44) and a persistent patent ductus arteriosus group (n = 17). A conservative approach for PDA, even in the case of prolonged PDA, does not increase the risk of neurodevelopmental impairment at 5 years of corrected age in preterm infants.