Alternative Methods for Anaerobic Power Assessment in Athletes: A Correlational Study of Wingate, Vertical Jump, and Standing Broad Jump Tests

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction. Power plays a vital role in various sporting activities in which the aerobic system produces the most energy. However, anaerobic power is vital when the player demands an immediate energy supply. The primary goal of this study is to determine whether the standing broad jump (SBJ) and vertical jump (VJ) tests can be correlated with those of the Win-gate ergometry test so that a reliable and cost-effective method for athlete monitoring and skill identification is available. Material and Methods. Forty healthy athletes, 26 males and 14 females from different sports, participated in the study. Each participant completed the Wingate, SBJ, and VJ tests in a controlled environment, and the results were analyzed. Results. Pearson's correlation test showed a positive correlation between peak power and the SBJ distance (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) and vertical jump height (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). Conclusions. VJ and SBJ tests can be used as alternative tests for assessing anaerobic capabilities, injury prevention, and pre-competition screening.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Joshi, K., & Singh, A. (2024). Alternative Methods for Anaerobic Power Assessment in Athletes: A Correlational Study of Wingate, Vertical Jump, and Standing Broad Jump Tests. Polish Journal of Sport and Tourism, 31(3), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.2478/pjst-2024-0017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free