A comparative analysis of design and analysis methods for steel connections: contrasting American and European perspectives

9Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Load transmission from one element to another is achieved using steel connections, making them an integral part of any structural design. This article examines the differences between the American Codes (AISC) and Eurocode 3 for the design and analysis of steel connections. Moment connections' stiffness, strength, and ductility as expressed in both codes are the core focus of this research. Each tactic's advantages and disadvantages have been detailed, and the effect of seismic load on steel connection design has been investigated. The feasibility of using techniques like haunches and stiffeners to enhance connection design is also explored. The study focuses on moment connections and how they fare under different loads and conditions like stiffness, strength, and ductility. Additionally, the effect of seismic loading on the development of steel connections is analyzed. Finally, the significance of testing and documentation to guarantee the safety and dependability of steel connections has been evaluated. This research can help engineers select a suitable code and connection typology for their projects for improved performance of the overall structural behaviour.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naqash, M. T., Alluqmani, A. E., & Farooq, Q. U. (2024). A comparative analysis of design and analysis methods for steel connections: contrasting American and European perspectives. Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Engineering and Architecture, 15(1), 14–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43995-023-00037-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free