Abstract
Quality improvement (QI) is an important function of learning health systems, and public policy should promote QI activities. Use of systematic methodologies in QI has prompted substantial confusion regarding when QI is human subjects research under the Common Rule, and this confusion persists with the revised Rule. Difficulty distinguishing research from QI imposes costs on the quality improvement process. I offer guidance to IRBs to mitigate these costs and suggest a new regulatory exclusion for minimal risk quality improvement activities.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rolnick, J. A. (2019). Learning Health Systems and the Revised Common Rule. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics, 47(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110519857279
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.