Perceptions of emergency department crowding in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania

7Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The state of emergency department (ED) crowding in Pennsylvania has not previously been reported. Methods: We assessed perceptions of ED crowding by surveying medical directors/chairs from Pennsylvania EDs in the spring of 2008. Results: A total of 106 completed the questionnaire (68% response rate). A total of 83% (86/104) agreed that ED crowding was a problem; 26% (27/105) reported that at least half of admitted patients boarded for more than 4 hours. Ninety-eight percent (102/104) agreed that patient satisfaction suffers during crowding and 79% (84/106) stated that quality suffers. Sixty-five percent (68/105) reported that crowding had worsened during the past 2 years. Several hospital interventions were used to alleviate crowding: expediting discharges, 81% (86/106); prioritizing ED patients for inpatient beds, 79% (84/106); and ambulance diversion, 55% (57/105). Almost all respondents who had improved ED operations reported that it had reduced crowding. Conclusion: ED crowding is a common problem in Pennsylvania and is worsening in the majority of hospitals, despite the implementation of a variety of interventions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pines, J. M., Isserman, J. A., & Kelly, J. J. (2013, February). Perceptions of emergency department crowding in the commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Western Journal of Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2011.5.6700

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free