Utility of artificial intelligence in prediction of hearing outcome after tympanoplasty

1Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the predictive performance of multiple machine-learning algorithms in forecasting postoperative air-bone gap following tympanoplasty and to determine the relative importance of clinical prognostic variables. Methods: This study was performed on patients who underwent tympanoplasty at a tertiary referral center. Preoperative factors were collected, including age, sex, smoking history, otorrhea, preoperative air-bone gap (ABG), contralateral ear status, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension (HTN). The target variable was postoperative ABG prediction. The cohort consisted of four years of retrospective data followed by one year of prospective enrollment. Six supervised machine-learning algorithms were applied to predict postoperative hearing outcomes. Results: A total of 439 cases were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 34.6 years. A development dataset of 366 tympanoplasty cases was analyzed, and an additional 73 cases were reserved for model validation. The Random Forest classifier achieved the highest predictive accuracy (93%) on the test dataset. Analysis of relative feature importance demonstrated that age, preoperative air-conduction threshold, and preoperative ABG were the primary determinants of postoperative hearing outcome. Conclusion: Machine-learning algorithms showed promising accuracy in predicting tympanoplasty success. In particular, the Random Forest model demonstrated superior performance. Incorporating AI-driven decision-support tools in otologic surgery may facilitate patient optimization and improve surgical planning.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mesalam, Z., Twakol Khalil, A., Elkahwagi, M., & Moneir, W. (2026). Utility of artificial intelligence in prediction of hearing outcome after tympanoplasty. Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology, 42(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-026-01116-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free