Face-to-face workin g memory training does not enhance children’s reading comprehension - a pilot study with Danish children1

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The argument that Working Memory (WM) is especially important for reading comprehension has been supported in previous research. The aim of this study was to test a non-computerized WM training method to improve children’s reading comprehension in a longitudinal design. 38 Danish children in 3rd and 4th grade (M = 112.9 months, SD = 7.90 months) were divided into a training group (N = 18) and a control group (N = 20). Assessments of sentence reading comprehension and WM were administered at pre- and post-test, half-year and one-year follow-up. Verbal WM and reading comprehension were not improved following training. Visuo-spatial WM improved at post-training, but the effect did not last into the one-year follow up. The role of WM in reading comprehension and the pedagogical implications for teaching are discussed.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Søndergaard Knudsen, H. B., & Jensen de López, K. M. (2021). Face-to-face workin g memory training does not enhance children’s reading comprehension - a pilot study with Danish children1. Nordic Psychology, 73(3), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/19012276.2020.1856001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free