Reproductive benefit of oxidative damage: An oxidative stress "malevolence"?

23Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

High levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) compared to antioxidant defenses are considered to play a major role in diverse chronic age-related diseases and aging. Here we present an attempt to synthesize information about proximate oxidative processes in aging (relevant to free radical or oxidative damage hypotheses of aging) with an evolutionary scenario (credited here to Dawkins hypotheses) involving tradeoffs between the costs and benefits of oxidative stress to reproducing organisms. Oxidative stress may be considered a biological imperfection; therefore, the Dawkins' theory of imperfect adaptation of beings to environment was applied to the role of oxidative stress in processes like famine and infectious diseases and their consequences at the molecular level such as mutations and cell signaling. Arguments are presented that oxidative damage is not necessarily an evolutionary mistake but may be beneficial for reproduction; this may prevail over its harmfulness to health and longevity in evolution. Thus, Dawkins' principle of biological malevolence may be an additional biological paradigm for explaining the consequences of oxidative stress. © 2011 B. Poljsak et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poljsak, B., Milisav, I., Lampe, T., & Ostan, I. (2011). Reproductive benefit of oxidative damage: An oxidative stress “malevolence”? Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/760978

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free