Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: How can we be systematic?

101Citations
Citations of this article
233Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Websites and online resources outside academic bibliographic databases can be significant sources for identifying literature, though there are challenges in searching and managing the results. These are pertinent to systematic reviews that are underpinned by principles of transparency, accountability and reproducibility. We consider how the conduct of searching these resources can be compatible with the principles of a systematic search. We present an approach to address some of the challenges. This is particularly relevant when websites are relied upon to identify important literature for a review. We recommend considering the process as three stages and having a considered rationale and sufficient recordkeeping at each stage that balances transparency with practicality of purpose. Advances in technology and recommendations for website providers are briefly discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stansfield, C., Dickson, K., & Bangpan, M. (2016, November 15). Exploring issues in the conduct of website searching and other online sources for systematic reviews: How can we be systematic? Systematic Reviews. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-016-0371-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free