Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Limitations

10Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Pulsed field ablation with irreversible electroporation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation involves tissue-specific and non-thermal energy-induced cell necrosis, which helps avoid complications, such as pulmonary vein stenosis, atrial collateral tissue damage, and extensive atrial structural damage, often encountered with traditional thermal ablation. In existing clinical trials, pulsed field ablation has shown excellent effects on pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Pulsed field ablation is easy, simple, and quick and can reduce iatrogenic injury. Therefore, the application of pulsed field ablation technology in the treatment of atrial fibrillation has a promising future. Notably, the adjustment of parameters in pulsed field ablation with different ablation catheter systems can strongly affect the area and depth of the necrotic myocardium, which greatly affects the likelihood of atrial fibrillation recurrence and incidence of adverse complications after ablation. In this paper, we review the mechanisms, advantages, and limitations of pulsed field ablation based on the results of a series of previous studies and provide ideas and directions for future research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, S., Qian, F., Ji, S., Li, L., Liu, Q., Zhou, S., & Xiao, Y. (2024, April 3). Pulsed Field Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Mechanisms, Advantages, and Limitations. Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine. IMR Press Limited. https://doi.org/10.31083/j.rcm2504138

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free