The Doctrine of Everlasting Punishment

  • Talbott T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

I argue that, although theism in general is consistent, many of the popular forms, specifically those that include the traditional doctrine of hell, are implicitly self-contradictory. After examining three varieties of theism, each of which involves, I contend, a logical impossibility of one kind or another, I conclude that nothing short of an explicit universalism--that is, nothing short of the view that God will eventually reconcile all persons to himself--is consistent with other doctrines essential to Christian theism.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Talbott, T. (1990). The Doctrine of Everlasting Punishment. Faith and Philosophy, 7(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.5840/faithphil1990711

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free