Associations between muscle strength, dyspnea and quality of life in post-COVID-19 patients

6Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) develop high muscle weakness. The objective of this study was to analyze the physical fitness of post-COVID-19 patients and its relationship with dyspnea and health-related quality of life (HrQoL). METHODS: This observational, retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted between October and November 2021 in the Universidad Europea de Madrid (Spain), with 32 post-COVID-19 patients aged 63.2 (14.1) years. Muscle strength, aerobic capacity, maximal respiratory mouth pressures, dyspnea, and HrQoL were analyzed 6–12 months after discharge for COVID-19. To analyze the relationship between continuous variables, Spearman’s correlation test and Pearson’s correlation test were performed. RESULTS: The participants had a mean handgrip strength of 22.1 (9.0) kg and very poor HrQoL. Negative moderate correlations were found between handgrip strength and length of hospital and intensive care unit stay (r=−0.37; p=0.002). In addition, muscle strength was negatively correlated with dyspnea (r=−0.37; p=0.008) and HrQoL, and moderate-large negative correlations were found between dyspnea and HrQoL. CONCLUSION: Higher handgrip strength was associated with lower COVID-19 severity and less sequelae. Therefore, either the patients with severe COVID-19 suffered greater muscle breakdown, or higher muscle strength acted as a mitigating factor for the disease. It is suggested that post-COVID-19 rehabilitation programs should focus on increasing muscle strength. Also, adequate physical fitness could mitigate the physical and mental post-COVID-19 sequelae.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Sevilla, G. G. P., & Sánchez-Pinto, B. (2022). Associations between muscle strength, dyspnea and quality of life in post-COVID-19 patients. Revista Da Associacao Medica Brasileira, 68(12), 1753–1758. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9282.20220974

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free