Routine calcitonin measurement in nodular thyroid disease management: Is it worthwhile?

15Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of routine calcitonin measurement in patients with nodular thyroid disease. Methods: Consecutive patients with nodular thyroid disease (n = 640) were studied. Serum calcitonin levels were measured under basal conditions, and when basal values were between 10-100 pg/mL, testing was repeated after pentagastrin (PG) stimulation. Patients with previously diagnosed or familial medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) were excluded. Patients were operated on when basal or stimulated calcitonin >100 pg/mL or when other surgical indications were present. Results: Four cases of MTC were identified. MTC was diagnosed in 75% of patients with basal calcitonin >100 pg/mL. One out of 11 patients with basal calcitonin between 10-100 pg/mL was diagnosed with MTC. PG stimulation resulted in elevation in 4 cases, where 1 case was diagnosed with MTC. Positive predictive value for basal calcitonin levels in the preoperative diagnosis of MTC was 5% for values between 10-100 pg/mL and 100% for values >100 pg/mL. Possible reasons for false positivity were papillary thyroid cancer in 17%, renal insufficiency in 8.3%, Hashimoto thyroiditis in 17% and β-blocker use in 33%. Positive predictive value for the PG test (>100 pg/mL) was 25% in the entire series. The cost of adding calcitonin measurement (±PG stimulation) to the preoperative work-up, resulted in ∈912.68 per MTC patient to detect the disease. Conclusion: Basal calcitonin measurement together with PG stimulation in cases of basal calcitonin >10 pg/mL detects MTC in 0.62% of patients with nodular thyroid disease.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Turk, Y., Makay, O., Ozdemir, M., Ertunc, G., Demir, B., Icoz, G., … Yilmaz, M. (2017). Routine calcitonin measurement in nodular thyroid disease management: Is it worthwhile? Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research, 92(4), 173–178. https://doi.org/10.4174/astr.2017.92.4.173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free