Estimating species richness: Still a long way off!

11Citations
Citations of this article
50Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Xu et al., in this issue of the Journal of Vegetation Science, compare several species richness estimators. All the non-parametric estimators, such as Chao and jackknife estimators, underestimated the true number, whereas all the area-based models, based on species-area curves, overestimated it. No reliable method yet exists to predict the number of species in an area that is appreciably larger than the one(s) sampled. Xu et al., in this issue of the Journal of Vegetation Science, compare several species-richness estimators. All the non-parametric estimators, such as Chao and jackknife estimators, under-estimated the true number, whereas all the area-based models, based on species-area curves, over-estimated it. No reliable method yet exists to predict the number of species in an area that is appreciably larger than the one(s) sampled. © 2012 International Association for Vegetation Science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chiarucci, A. (2012, December). Estimating species richness: Still a long way off! Journal of Vegetation Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free