High flow or titrated oxygen for obese medical inpatients: A randomised crossover trial

8Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects on transcutaneous carbon dioxide tension (PtCO2) of high concentration and titrated oxygen therapy in medical inpatients with morbid obesity who were not selected for a pre-existing diagnosis of obesity hypoventilation syndrome. Design: A randomised, crossover trial undertaken between February and September 2015. Setting: Internal medicine service, Wellington Regional Hospital, New Zealand. Participants: 22 adult inpatients, aged 16 years or more, with a body mass index exceeding 40 kg/m2. Interventions: Participants received in random order two 60-minute interventions, with a minimum 30-minute washout period between treatments: titrated oxygen therapy (oxygen delivered, if required, via nasal prongs to achieve peripheral oxygen saturation [SpO2] of 88e92%), and high concentration oxygen therapy (delivered via Hudson mask at 8 L/min, without regard to SpO2). PtCO2 and SpO2 were recorded at 10-minute intervals. Main outcome measure: PtCO2 at 60 minutes, adjusted for baseline. Results: Baseline PtCO2 was 45 mmHg or lower for 16 participants with full data (73%). The mean difference in PtCO2 between high concentration and titrated oxygen therapy at 60 minutes was 3.2 mmHg (95% CI, 1.3e5.2 mmHg; P = 0.002). Conclusion: High concentration oxygen therapy increases PtCO2 in morbidly obese patients. Our findings support guidelines that advocate oxygen therapy, if required in patients with morbid obesity, be titrated to achieve a target SpO2 of 88e92%. Clinical trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12610000522011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pilcher, J., Richards, M., Eastlake, L., McKinstry, S. J., Bardsley, G., Jefferies, S., … Beasley, R. (2017). High flow or titrated oxygen for obese medical inpatients: A randomised crossover trial. Medical Journal of Australia, 207(10), 430–434. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja17.00270

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free