Preponderance of basic isoforms of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) is associated with the high bio/immuno ratio of LH in healthy women and in women with polycystic ovarian disease

37Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In an attempt to correlate serum LH isoform distribution with its bio/immuno ratio, follicular phase blood samples from four normally cycling women and four patients with polycystic ovarian disease (PCOD) were studied. Chromatofocusing of peripheral serum samples across a pH gradient of 9.5-4.5 yielded a broad area of LH immunoreactivity comprising several peaks in the pH range of 7.2-9.0, and six other major peaks at pH values of 9.4, 6.8, 6.4, 5.1, 4.7 and<4.0. In addition, the bioactive and Immunoreactive levels of LH were measured in the unfractionated serum samples. In three out of four PCOD patients and one healthy woman, the majority of LH species (∼70%) were distributed at a pI value>7.0. All of them had a high bio/immuno ratio (<2.0) and an elevated bioactive level of serum LH (>40 IU/l). Conversely, fewer alkaline pI isoform.s of LH were found in the other three normal women and one PCOD patient, who had low levels of the bio/immuno ratio of LH (< 2.0) and bioactive LH (<40 IU/I). A significant (P<0.05) direct corrlelation was observed between the bio/iminuno ratio of serum LH and the proportion of alkaline LH eluted. In conclusion, as demonstrated previously in the pituitary, the bio/immuno ratio of serum LH also correlates well with the charge distribution of LH isoforms. The results indicate that an altered isoform distribution with more basic LH forms is associated with a high biological activity of serum LH. © 1991 Oxford University Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ding, Y. Q., & Huhtaniemi, I. (1991). Preponderance of basic isoforms of serum luteinizing hormone (LH) is associated with the high bio/immuno ratio of LH in healthy women and in women with polycystic ovarian disease. Human Reproduction, 6(3), 346–350. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137336

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free