Abstract
This randomized, controlled trial involving 316 patients in the home setting found no difference in the rate of phlebitis and/or occlusion among patients for whom a peripheral intravenous catheter was routinely resited at 72-96 hours and those for whom it was replaced only on clinical indication (76.8 events per 1,000 device-days vs 87.3 events per 1,000 device-days; P = .71). There were no bloodstream infections.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Van Donk, P., Rickard, C. M., McGrail, M. R., & Doolan, G. (2009). Routine Replacement versus Clinical Monitoring of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in a Regional Hospital in the Home Program A Randomized Controlled Trial. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 30(9), 915–917. https://doi.org/10.1086/599776
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.