Routine Replacement versus Clinical Monitoring of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in a Regional Hospital in the Home Program A Randomized Controlled Trial

  • Van Donk P
  • Rickard C
  • McGrail M
  • et al.
57Citations
Citations of this article
79Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This randomized, controlled trial involving 316 patients in the home setting found no difference in the rate of phlebitis and/or occlusion among patients for whom a peripheral intravenous catheter was routinely resited at 72-96 hours and those for whom it was replaced only on clinical indication (76.8 events per 1,000 device-days vs 87.3 events per 1,000 device-days; P = .71). There were no bloodstream infections.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Donk, P., Rickard, C. M., McGrail, M. R., & Doolan, G. (2009). Routine Replacement versus Clinical Monitoring of Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in a Regional Hospital in the Home Program A Randomized Controlled Trial. Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 30(9), 915–917. https://doi.org/10.1086/599776

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free