Prevalence of congenital malformations among babies delivered at a tertiary care hospital

7Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Congenital malformations have emerged as a major cause of stillbirths and neonatal mortality. It is a common cause of morbidity and mortality not only in the newborn but also in childhood and beyond. The objective of this study was to find the prevalence of congenital malformation at birth. Methods: The descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 2456 live births in Kathmandu Medical College and Teaching Hospital from April 2017 to March 2018 after obtaining ethical approval from the institutional review committee (Ref no. 08052017). A convenient sampling method was applied. All the live-born babies delivered in this hospital during the study period were clinically examined for the presence of congenital anomalies. All malformations were classified according to the International Classification of Diseases-10 classification. The mothers of the newborns with congenital malformations were interviewed in a predesigned proforma. Statistical analysis was done using statistical package for the social sciences version 20. Results: Out of 2456 examined live births, congenital malformations were observed in 66 cases. The prevalence of congenital malformation was 66 (2.6%) at 95% confidence interval (4.19-1.98) of total live births. The genitourinary system was the most common system involved with congenital malformations being 16 (24.2%), followed by musculoskeletal system 14 (21.2%), and cardiovascular system 12 (18.2%). Conclusions: Congenital malformation plays a major role in the mortality and morbidity of neonates as well as children. The genitourinary system was the most common system involved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shrestha, S., & Shrestha, A. (2020). Prevalence of congenital malformations among babies delivered at a tertiary care hospital. Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 58(225), 310–313. https://doi.org/10.31729/jnma.4985

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free