Abstract
Current approaches to the assessment and classification of personality disorders (PDs) rely almost exclusively on self-report methodology. In this paper, we document the many difficulties with self-reports, including limitations in their accuracy, the confounding effect of mood state, and problems with the selection and retention of factors in factor analytic approaches to self-report questionnaires. We also discuss the role of implicit processes in self-reports, with special attention directed to the phenomenon of priming and its effect on outcome. To rectify these issues, we suggest a transtheoretical, multimethod, multimodal approach to personality pathology assessment and diagnosis, which utilizes the richness of prototypes and empirical findings on PD categories and pathologies. © 2011 The Guilford Press.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Huprich, S. K., Bornstein, R. F., & Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and clasification of axis II personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.557
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.