Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and clasification of axis II personality disorders

83Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Current approaches to the assessment and classification of personality disorders (PDs) rely almost exclusively on self-report methodology. In this paper, we document the many difficulties with self-reports, including limitations in their accuracy, the confounding effect of mood state, and problems with the selection and retention of factors in factor analytic approaches to self-report questionnaires. We also discuss the role of implicit processes in self-reports, with special attention directed to the phenomenon of priming and its effect on outcome. To rectify these issues, we suggest a transtheoretical, multimethod, multimodal approach to personality pathology assessment and diagnosis, which utilizes the richness of prototypes and empirical findings on PD categories and pathologies. © 2011 The Guilford Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huprich, S. K., Bornstein, R. F., & Schmitt, T. A. (2011). Self-report methodology is insufficient for improving the assessment and clasification of axis II personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25(5), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2011.25.5.557

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free