Open versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: outcomes of the ORREO prospective randomized controlled trial

25Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (rRMVHR) potentially combines the best features of open and minimally invasive VHR: myofascial release with abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with the lower wound morbidity of laparoscopic VHR. Proliferation of this technique has outpaced the data supporting this claim. We report 2-year outcomes of the first randomized controlled trial of oRMVHR vs rRMVHR. Methods: Single-center randomized control trial of open vs rRMVHR. 100 patients were randomized (50 open, 50 robotic). We included patients > 18 y/o with hernias 7–15 cm with at least one of the following: diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30, or current smokers. Primary outcome was occurrence of a composite outcome of surgical site infection (SSI), non-seroma surgical site occurrence (SSO), readmission, or hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, any SSI or SSO, SSI/SSOPI, operative time, patient reported quality of life, and cost. Analysis was performed in an intention-to-treat fashion. Study was funded by a grant from Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Results: 90 patients were available for 30-day and 62 for 2-year analysis (rRMVHR = 46 and 32, oRMVHR = 44 and 30). Hernias in the open group were slightly larger (10 vs 8 cm, p = 0.024) and more likely to have prior mesh (36.4 vs 15.2%; p = 0.030), but were similar in length, prior hernia repairs, mesh use, and myofascial release. There was no difference in primary composite outcome between oRMVHR and rRMVHR (20.5 vs 19.6%, p = 1.000). Median length of stay was shorter for rRMVHR (1 vs 2 days; p < 0.001). All patients had significant improvement in quality of life at 1 and 2 years. Other secondary outcomes were similar. Conclusion: There is no difference in a composite outcome including SSI, SSOPI, readmission, and hernia recurrence between open and robotic RMVHR. Graphical abstract: (Figure presented.)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warren, J. A., Blackhurst, D., Ewing, J. A., & Carbonell, A. M. (2024). Open versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: outcomes of the ORREO prospective randomized controlled trial. Surgical Endoscopy , 38(12), 7466–7474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11202-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free