In vitro/in vivo correlation of fast release mephenamic acid microspheres in humans

5Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to assess the bioavailability of an optimized mephenamic acid (MFA) microspheres (test) against a Ponstan® capsule (reference) in healthy volunteers, and to establish a correlation with in vitro parameters. Subjects andMethods: Four subjects received the test and reference (250 mg MFA each) in a randomized crossover design, separated by a 1-week washout period. The drug was analyzed in plasma by a specific high-performance liquid chromatographic method. The relevant pharmacokinetic parameters [maximum plasma concentration (C max), time of peak concentration (T max), area under plasma concentration-time curves from 0 to 12 h (AUC 0-12) and area under plasma concentration-time curves from zero to ∞ (AUC 0-∞)] were calculated from the plasma drug concentration-time data. Results: The test product exhibited faster absorption (T max of 1.87 ± 0.482 vs. 2.14 ± 0.20 h; C max of 5.91 ± 0.604 vs. 3.58 ± 0.671 μg/ml) when compared to the reference. The relative bioavailability of the test compared to the reference capsule was 172%. Good correlations were established between the in vitro 90% dissolution (T90) and each of the AUC 0-12 and T max, as well as between the percentage of drug released and plasma concentrations. Conclusion: The formulation of MFA microsphere with polyethylene glycol improved the dissolution rate and bioavailability of MFA, as evidenced by a higher C max, AUC 0-12 and AUC 0-∞, and shorter T max values. Good correlations between T90 and both AUC 0-12 and T max as well as between the percentage of drug released and plasma concentrations were achieved. Copyright © 2011 S. Karger AG.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Etman, M. A., Farid, R. M., Nada, A. H., & Ebian, A. A. R. (2012). In vitro/in vivo correlation of fast release mephenamic acid microspheres in humans. Medical Principles and Practice, 21(3), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1159/000333558

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free