Intuitive judgement in the context of osteopathic clinical reasoning

2Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Previous research into osteopathic clinical and diagnostic decision making suggests that reasoning is commonly based on highly analytical as well as intuitive processes. According to the dual-process theory, the intuitive and analytical processing that leads to decision making is equally important in diagnostic reasoning. This article aims to explore the underlying and influencing factors that may lead to the development and reliability of intuition in clinical decision making generally and in osteopathic clinical reasoning specifically. Practical suggestions are given on how to encourage the development of intuition within the context of osteopathic teaching and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liem, T. (2017). Intuitive judgement in the context of osteopathic clinical reasoning. Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 117(9), 586–594. https://doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2017.113

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free